Archaeology Magazine Archive

A publication of the Archaeological Institute of America

Special Introductory Offer!
latest news
Archaeology Magazine News Archive
2008-2012


Visit www.archaeology.org/news for the latest archaeological headlines!

Thursday, February 17
by Archaeology Magazine
February 17, 2009

China wants two sculptures–bronze rabbit and rat heads–that were among 12 animal head sculptures that were looted when the Old Summer Palace of Emperor Qianlong (1736-1795) was burned down by Anglo-French allied forces in 1860. The heads are due to be auctioned at Christie’s in Paris.

Meanwhile, Beijing will lend 29 Qing Dynasty artifacts to Taiwan’s National Palace Museum for a joint exhibit this fall, the first major cultural exchange since the Chinese civil war six decades ago.

According to AP: “Mexico has denied a U.S. sea salvage company’s request to explore and recover artifacts from a sunken 17th-century Spanish galleon in the Gulf, the government said Monday.” The article identifies the ship as Our Lady of Juncal, a galleon that sank in a storm in 1631, and the company as Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc. of Tampa, Florida.

Principal Chief Michell Hicks of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians is not happy about plans to expand the Macon County Airport’s runway through an ancient site. An archaeologist who worked at the site in 2000 describes it as “perhaps the most significant Native American site that will be found in the region in our lifetimes.”

This opinion piece links colliding submarines and satellites with middens and Bryan Ward-Perkins’ The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization (Oxford University Press, 2005).

A follow-up story on the report that many of the UK’s ancient and historic sites are under threat
from illegal metal detector users.

“Fort Madison is probably the most historically significant site in Iowa,” says University of Iowa professor and state archaeologist Bill Whittaker. This is a brief note about the celebration of the bicentennial anniversary of the start of construction of the original fort.

Comments posted here do not represent the views or policies of the Archaeological Institute of America.

Comments are closed.




Advertisement


Advertisement