Archaeology Magazine Archive

A publication of the Archaeological Institute of America

Special Introductory Offer!


Beyond Stone & Bone

Mail, Comments and Creationists
by Heather Pringle
September 5, 2008

Max

This week I thought I’d reply to some of the comments that you have kindly posted over the past few months. I really regret that I can’t answer each and every missive, but there’s just not enough hours in the day, particularly when I have a manic, seven-month old Labrador retriever puppy roaming the house. If he’s not taken out on long, exhausting walks three times a day, he devours scientific articles, munches books, demolishes entire book cases and generally wreaks havoc.

Ok, now down to business. In response to my blog on creationism, a reader wrote to tell me that I was hopelessly out of date when I suggested that the “first Native Americans were Asia migrants who trekked on foot across the vast grasslands of Beringia or paddled in boats along the northern Pacific rim more than 13,000 years ago.” This reader—who describes herself as a Native American who believes that “we have always been here”—points out that the oldest layer at the Topper site in South Carolina dates to some 50,000 years ago. She also notes that earlier dates could still emerge from the Americas, and observes that modern humans dispersed out of Africa only 60,000 to 80,000 years ago.

I think this reader is indulging in some very wishful thinking. First of all, the Topper dates are not widely accepted in the archaeological community. Critics have particularly questioned the “stone tools” unearthed in the site’s 50,000-year-old layer, observing that they look like flakes created by natural forces instead of human artifacts. Beyond that, however, there is simply no evidence that modern humans evolved in the New World. Paleoanthropologists have failed to uncover any fossil remains showing that Homo erectus or Homo neanderthalensis reached the Americas, then evolved into Homo sapiens . Instead, a staggering body of evidence shows that the first Americans were H. sapiens migrants, and current data suggests that they arrived in the New World no more than 30,000 years ago. Check out the paper that Ted Goebel, an archaeologist at the Center for the Study of the First Americans at Texas A& M University, and colleagues published in Science in March 2008. It superbly synthesizes the daunting body of archaeological and genetic evidence on this important issue.

Another reader has chided me for placing my money on science and dissing faith and philosophy in the creationist blog. “What in the world,” he wonders, “are we fighting about when mutual respect through discussion—not debate—would enrich everyone’s understanding of the truth.”

Contrary to what this reader implies, I’m happy to discuss and debate this matter with anyone. And I personally believe there is much we could all learn from the sacred stories of Native Americans: they distill thousands of years of human wisdom and experience. But on the subject of Native American origins, these stories are clearly metaphorical, not factual. Science, as imperfect as it is, gives us our best glimpse at where the first Americans came from and how they got here. I simply can’t ignore all that archaeological, genetic and linguistic evidence. Sorry.

Last but not least, I want to thank readers for sending those terrific suggestions for the best archaeological novels. The list is growing, but I’d love to hear from more of you before I post the new, improved model. Please send me your suggestions.

Comments posted here do not represent the views or policies of the Archaeological Institute of America.

10 comments for "Mail, Comments and Creationists"

  • Reply posted by Kristen (September 7, 2008, 9:47 am):

    I just want to say that I wholly agreed with your Native American Creationists commentary, both in your original blog, and above.

    I’m a Christian myself, but prefer debate and discussion that does not attempt to ignore the evidence and mysteries of the world around us. How terrible a thing to persecute today’s Galileos!

    I was glad your commentary pointed out that the blinders of creationism are not limited to small pockets of christianity, but can be found in any faith or community that feels threatened by facts or information outside of its original small body of knowledge.

    I didn’t post anything simply because I felt I had nothing more to add to your well-written commentary. But since it seems you have received enough email criticisms that you decided to respond, I thought I would simply add my vote of support for your original comments.

         

  • Reply posted by Phyllis Lowry (September 9, 2008, 6:46 am):

    Science is never absolute, there is always the possibility for change. Contrary to others, the Topper Site as well as other Pre-Clovis sites such as Cactus Hill in Virginia, Paisley Caves of Oregon, artifacts at Monte Verde, Chile and Meadowcroft Rockshelter in Pennsylvania just goes to prove that theories are just that, a theory that is subject to change. Everything is up for debate even the question of “Where did Lucy the 3.16 million year old skeleton of Africa migrate from?” Or was she too, also always here?

         

  • Reply posted by Bill Clinton (March 8, 2009, 8:48 pm):

    This post has good and valuable information, Is nice to see some good articles like this one, thank you.

         

  • Reply posted by Authors Community (March 24, 2009, 4:04 pm):

    Appreciate the info guys, thanks

         

  • Reply posted by Daniel Molitor (March 25, 2009, 7:58 pm):

    Well, I admit, it’s partly shameless self-promotion, but I’m really proud on my last novel, The Final Oracle, which is the second in my “archaeology trilogy.” The books focus on a husband and wife team, one of whom specializes in “rescue” field work. I like books that promote the fun and excitement of doing science, and the power of what it can do, what it can reveal, and how that affects real people. And, if they wow readers with a great story, too, well so much the better!

         

  • Reply posted by Heather (March 25, 2009, 9:02 pm):

    Congratulations, Daniel. I’m swamped with deadlines at the moment, but when I have a bit of breathing room, I’ll take a look at your novels.

    If others have had a chance to read them, please post a comment.

         

  • Reply posted by Dura Ace (August 8, 2009, 12:08 am):

    Not so long ago I discovered your website and have been reading along quietly. I decided I could give my opening comment. I dont know exactly what to write but that Ive loved reading it. Cool website. I will carry on visiting this site very often. I have also got your RSS feed to get any updates.

         

  • Reply posted by Retriever trainer (July 24, 2010, 11:28 am):

    Heather,

    Love the picture of your Labrador puppy. Looks like she’s settled in for another long debate on the dates for the earliest humans in North America.

         

  • Reply posted by Dionysus (August 3, 2010, 12:26 am):

    Have to agree about the picture of the lab. Now it’s time to get back to ancient Aptera in Crete and see what the Romans left us a couple of thousand years ago!

         

  • Reply posted by Heather Pringle (August 3, 2010, 11:24 am):

    Yes, am afraid my lab far prefers chowing down to listening up to archaeological debates.

    Definitely write again, Dionysus, and let us know what cool things you are finding in ancient Aptera!

         


About Our Blogger:

Heather Pringle is a freelance science journalist who has been writing about archaeology for more than 20 years. She is the author of Master Plan: Himmler's Scholars and the Holocaust and The Mummy Congress: Science, Obsession, and the Everlasting Dead. For more about Heather, see our interview or visit www.lastwordonnothing.com.

Thanks for writing! While we may not be able to respond to every message, we appreciate your comments and suggestions. (Comments are now closed.)


RSS feed
Trowel Tales: The AIA Blog


Advertisement


Advertisement

  • Subscribe to the Digital Edition